Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG)
This article is a work in progress.
We're currently working on completing this content.
Your contribution will be immensely helpful for our mission of providing efficient and enjoyable learning experiences.
undefined. Vector Databases
Vector databases are specialized storage and retrieval systems designed to efficiently manage high-dimensional vector embeddings. Unlike traditional databases optimized for exact matches, these systems excel at similarity search—finding vectors that are close to a query vector in multidimensional space.
This capability is foundational for modern NLP applications that rely on semantic matching rather than keyword search. As embedding models have become more powerful and organizations accumulate larger collections of text data, the need for efficiently querying billions of vectors has driven the development of specialized database technologies.
Vector databases integrate sophisticated indexing algorithms, optimized storage formats, and query mechanisms designed specifically for the unique challenges of high-dimensional vector operations. They form a critical component in the infrastructure of semantic search, recommendation systems, and retrieval-augmented generation applications.
undefined. Approximate Nearest Neighbors (ANN) Search
Approximate Nearest Neighbors (ANN) algorithms form the core technology of vector search systems, addressing the computational challenge of finding similar vectors in high-dimensional spaces. While exact nearest neighbor search becomes prohibitively expensive as data scales, ANN algorithms trade perfect accuracy for dramatic speed improvements with minimal practical impact on result quality.
Locality-Sensitive Hashing (LSH) represents one of the earliest effective ANN approaches. It uses hash functions that map similar vectors to the same buckets with high probability. By creating multiple hash tables with different hash functions, LSH can efficiently identify candidate neighbors while dramatically reducing the search space compared to exhaustive comparison.
Tree-Based Methods like ANNOY (Approximate Nearest Neighbors Oh Yeah) use multiple random projection trees to partition the vector space. Each tree splits the data recursively along random hyperplanes, creating a forest of trees that can be queried in sublinear time. By building multiple trees with different splitting strategies, these methods balance efficiency with result quality.
Graph-Based Approaches like HNSW (Hierarchical Navigable Small World) construct multilayer graphs where nodes are vectors and edges connect similar vectors. Search traverses these graphs starting from entry points and following edges to progressively closer neighbors. These methods achieve exceptional performance but require more memory than other approaches.
Product Quantization techniques compress vectors by dividing them into subvectors and quantizing each subpart independently. This enables storage of billions of vectors in memory while computing approximate distances efficiently. Facebook's FAISS library implements various quantization approaches that scale to web-scale collections.
Hybrid Approaches combine multiple techniques to balance performance, memory usage, and accuracy. Modern vector databases typically implement several ANN algorithms with tunable parameters, allowing system designers to optimize for their specific requirements around latency, throughput, recall, and memory footprint.
These algorithms enable semantic search over billions of documents with sub-second latency, making them essential infrastructure for modern AI applications that require finding information based on meaning rather than exact matching.
undefined. Vector Database Architectures
Vector database architectures have evolved to address the unique requirements of storing, indexing, and retrieving high-dimensional embeddings at scale. These systems must balance search performance, storage efficiency, update capabilities, and integration with existing data infrastructure.
In-Memory Vector Databases prioritize query performance by keeping indexes and often the vectors themselves in RAM. This approach minimizes retrieval latency but limits scale based on available memory. Systems like Milvus, Qdrant, and FAISS optimize memory layout and access patterns for vector operations while providing mechanisms to persist data for durability.
Disk-Based Architectures trade some performance for dramatically increased capacity by storing vectors on SSDs or traditional disks. These systems employ sophisticated caching strategies, read-ahead mechanisms, and layout optimizations to minimize the impact of disk access on query performance. This approach enables economical scaling to trillions of vectors across distributed storage.
Hybrid Transactional-Analytical Systems support both fast vector insertions/updates and efficient similarity search queries. Unlike read-only indexes that require rebuilding when data changes, these architectures use incremental indexing strategies and delta mechanisms to maintain search performance while allowing continuous updates.
Multi-Modal Database Designs combine vector search capabilities with traditional relational or document database features. These systems store vectors alongside metadata, enabling filtered searches that combine semantic similarity with exact matching on attributes (e.g., "find semantically similar documents written after 2020 by author X").
Distributed Vector Databases distribute embedding collections across multiple nodes to scale beyond single-machine capacity. They employ sharding strategies that balance load while minimizing cross-node coordination during queries, using techniques like local indexes combined with global aggregation of results.
Cloud-Native Vector Services provide fully managed vector search capabilities with automatic scaling, replication, and maintenance. These services abstract infrastructure complexity while optimizing for cost-efficiency through resource sharing and elastic scaling based on workload patterns.
As vector search becomes central to modern AI applications, these database architectures continue to evolve with innovations in data structures, memory management, and distributed systems design tailored specifically to the challenges of high-dimensional similarity search.